Without
the right of return there can be no solution ….
by
Sari Hanafi
Published
27/9/2004 (c) bitterlemons.org
The
right of return of Palestinian refugees to their place of origin is enshrined
in four separate bodies of international law: humanitarian law; human rights
law; the law of nationality as applied to state succession; and refugee law.
Beyond these laws, which apply to all refugees in the world, the UN General
Assembly specified the Palestinian case in Resolution
194, paragraph 11 which sets forth a framework for a solution to
the problem of Palestinian refugees, including the possibility of return:
"The refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with
their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date,
and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to
return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of
international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or
authorities responsible."
To
understand the importance of the refugee issue to Palestinians, we must in
addition understand that the Palestinian nation and Palestinian nationalism as
it exists today was born with the expulsion of more than half the Palestinian
people from their land in 1948 and one of the fundamental aspects of
Palestinian identity is "refugeehood."
Such an understanding obliges us to address the problem of the Palestinian
refugees as fundamental to any solution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
There
are five reasons for this:
First,
as long as the Israelis do not take into consideration what happened to the
Palestinians in 1948 and the expulsion of the indigenous population from 78
percent of the land of historic Palestine, they will keep bargaining about the
remaining 22 percent (the West Bank including east Jerusalem and the Gaza
Strip). There is no solution to the land issue without coupling it to the
refugee issue. This may be the reason why Oslo failed.
Secondly,
resolving the refugee issue is not just a technical matter of absorption nor
is it a matter of reciting international law like reciting the Koran. Rather,
it is to deconstruct the whole Palestinian-Israeli conflict to its very
premises, to understand how its causes led to a certain kind of colonial
practice, and to recognize the need for a debate, not just to understand, but
to acknowledge and accept historic responsibility. This is the very
precondition for any true reconciliation and mutual forgiveness, as suggested
by Edward Said.
Third,
irrespective of whether the final resolution of the conflict takes the form of
a two-state or a bi-national state solution, the refugee issue cannot be
considered secondary. The current intifada has
revealed the importance of the refugees; they are the social and political
actors most unable to bear the impasse in the Oslo process.
Fourth,
beyond the moral and symbolic value of realizing the right of return, the
right is useful in creating a framework for providing refugees with a choice
between remaining in their host countries, returning to their places of origin
or coming to a future Palestinian state (or third countries). The right of
choice is a necessity for those who have, for half a century, been forced to
live as aliens without basic rights in miserable camps and in states that have
not always embraced them with open arms.
Finally,
if the right of return and the right of choice is accepted, it will open many
possibilities for the refugees to choose from. The movement of refugees
depends on many factors related to the social, economic, cultural and identity
spheres. The return of refugees does not mean that the whole refugee community
will move. In almost all cases, the experience of refugees across the world
shows that the number of those who return is less than those who choose other
solutions. The Israeli phobia to return is unjustified.
Hannah
Arendt, in her study of totalitarianism, reminds
us of "the decision of statesmen to solve the problem of statelessness by
ignoring it." She insisted on the necessity of examining displacement
through the prism of often xenophobic nation states, and she traced the
political and symbolic logics that had the effect of pathologizing
and even criminalizing refugees. The contemporary linkage that has been forged
between Palestinian return and a disturbance of the regional order, especially
in Israel, attests to the continuing relevance of Arendt's
point.-
Sari
Hanafi is the director of the Palestinian Diaspora
and Refugee Center, Shaml.
His view expresses only his own opinion.